{"id":5061,"date":"2024-09-16T14:58:19","date_gmt":"2024-09-16T18:58:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/?p=5061"},"modified":"2024-09-18T11:20:11","modified_gmt":"2024-09-18T15:20:11","slug":"two-non-native-insects-threaten-forest-salmonid-and-waterway-conservation-in-pacific-northwest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/?p=5061","title":{"rendered":"Two Non-Native Insects Threaten Forest, Salmonid, and Waterway Conservation in Pacific Northwest"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\"\"<\/a>
Oregon ash dominate wetlands of Ankeny NWR; photo by Wyatt Williams, Oregon Department of Forestry<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

One of these insects is the emerald ash borer (EAB). We easterners have \u201cbeen there & done that\u201d. However, programs aimed at conserving wetlands and riparian areas of the Western states \u2013 and the associated species — are at least as vulnerable to loss of ash. Worse, other tree taxa, specifically oaks, and the open woodlands they inhabit — are also under threat. The ecological tragedies continue to affect ever more forests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

|Emerald Ash Borer in Oregon and British Columbia<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. <\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    The emerald ash borer (EAB; Agrilus planipennis<\/em>) was detected in Oregon in June 2022. Officials had been expecting an introduction and had begun preparations<\/a>. Unsurprisingly, the infestation is more widespread than known at first: detections in two new locations, fairly close to the original in Forest Grove, mean the infested area now occupies three neighboring counties — Washington, Yamhill, and Marion counties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Oregon officials are trying to slow spread of EAB by removing infested trees. Surveys in Washington County had identified 190 infested ash trees; 80 were removed in April 2024. They treated healthy ash trees in Washington County with injections of the systemic insecticide emamectin benzoate. The effort was already a daunting task: the survey had disclosed 6,500 ash trees in the vicinity. The city of Portland \u2013 only 25 miles away \u2013 has 94,000 ash trees (Profita 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    In May, 2024 EAB was detected in the city of Vancouver in British Columbia<\/a><\/strong>. This detection in the sixth Canadian province adds to the threat to the ecosystems of the region. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) now regulates the movement of all ash material such as logs, branches, and woodchips, and all species of firewood, from the affected sites.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The CFIA is also conducting surveillance activities to determine where EAB might be present, and is collaborating with the City of Vancouver, the Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation, the Province of British Columbia, and other stakeholders to respond to the detections and slow the spread of this pest.<\/p>\n\n\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

    Importance of Oregon ash (Fraxinus latifolia<\/em>)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The Oregon ash is the only ash species native to the Pacific Northwest. Its range stretches from southern British Columbia to so California, where it has hybridized with velvet ash (F. velutina<\/em>). It is highly susceptible to EAB attack; there is a high probability that Oregon ash could be rendered functionally extinct (Maze, Bond and Mattsson 2024). This vulnerability prompted the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) to classify  Oregon ash as \u201cnear threatened\u201d as long ago as 2017 (Melton et al<\/em>. 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Oregon ash typically grows in moist, bottomland habitats. There it is a late-successional climax species.  In Oregon\u2019s Willamette Valley and Washington\u2019s Puget Trough, the tree improves streams\u2019 water quality by providing shade, bank stabilization, and filtration of pollutants and excess nutrients. Maintaining these ecological services is particularly important because these streams are crucial to salmonids (salmon and trout) and other native aquatic species (Maze, Bond and Mattsson 2024).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    So it is not surprising that one component of Oregonians\u2019 pre-detection preparations was an analysis of the likely impact of widespread ash mortality on populations of salmon, trout, and other aquatic species. I summarize the key findings of Maze, Bond and Mattsson here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    According to this study, salmonids and other cold-water aquatic species suffer population declines and health effects when stream water temperatures are too warm. A critical factor in maintaining stream temperatures is shade \u2013 usually created by trees. In the Pacific Northwest many streams\u2019 temperatures already exceed levels needed to protect sensitive aquatic species. A key driver of increased stream temperatures \u2013 at least in the Willamette Basin \u2013 is clearing of forests to allow agriculture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Decreasing streams\u2019 temperatures is not only a good thing to do; it is legally required by the Endangered Species Act<\/a> because several salmon and steelhead trout species are listed. In one response, the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality recommends restoration and protection of riparian vegetation as the primary methods for increasing stream shading and mitigating increased stream temperatures in the lower Willamette Basin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The forests shading many low-elevation forested wetlands and tributaries of the Willamette and lower Columbia rivers are often composed exclusively of Oregon ash.  <\/strong>Loss of these trees\u2019 shade will affect not just the immediate streams but also increase the temperature of mainstem waterways downstream.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a>
    Oregon ash – EAB detection site; photo by Wyatt Williams, Oregon Department of Forestry<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

    Replacements for Oregon Ash?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The magnitude of the ecological impacts of ash mortality in the many forested wetlands in the Willamette Valley will largely be determined by what plant associations establish after the ash die. Oregon ash is uniquely able to tolerate soils inundated for extended periods. No native tree species can fill the void <\/strong>when the ash die. Oregon white oak (Quercus garryana<\/em>), black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa<\/em>), and the alders (Alnus rubra <\/em>and A. rhombifolia<\/em>), are shade intolerant and unlikely to persist in later seral stages in some settings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    If non-native species fill the gaps, they will provide inferior levels of ecosystem services \u2013 I would think particularly regarding wildlife habitat and invertebrate forage. Maze, Bond and Mattsson expect loss of ash to trigger significant physical and chemical changes. These will directly impact water quality and alter native plant and animal communities\u2019 composition and successional trajectories.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The authors cite expectations of scientists studying loss of black ash<\/a> (F. nigra<\/em>) from upper Midwestern wetlands. <\/strong> There, research indicates loss of ash from these systems is likely to result in higher water tables and a conversion from forested to graminoid- or shrub-dominated systems. Significant changes follow: to food webs, to habitat structure, and, potentially, to nitrogen cycling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Maze, Bond and Mattsson expect similar impacts in Willamette Valley wetlands and floodplains, especially those with the longest inundation periods and highest water tables. That is, there will probably be a broad disruption of successional dynamics and, at many sites, a conversion to open, shrub-dominated systems or to wetlands invaded by exotic reed canary grass<\/strong> (Phalaris arundinacea<\/em>), with occasional sedge-dominated<\/strong> (Carex obnupta<\/em>) wetlands. They think this change is especially likely under canopies composed of Oregon white oak <\/strong>(see below). The authors admit some uncertainty regarding the trajectories of succession because 90 years of water-control projects has almost eliminated the possibility of high-intensity floods.<\/p>\n\n\n

    \n
    \"\"<\/a>
    Steelhead trout<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

    Oregon Ash and Salmonids<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Maze, Bond and Mattsson point out that all salmonids <\/strong>that spawn in the Willamette basin and the nearly 250,000 square mile extent of the Columbia basin upstream of Portland pass through the two wooded waterways in the Portland area that they studied<\/strong>. Applying a model to simulate disappearance of ash from these forests, the authors found that the reduced shade would raise the \u201csolar load\u201d on one waterway, which is wide and slow-moving, by 1.8%. On the second, much narrower, creek (mean channel width of 7 m), solar load was increased by of 23.7%.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Maze, Bond and Mattsson argue that even small changes can be important. Both waterbodies already regularly exceed Oregon\u2019s target water temperature throughout the summer. Any increase in solar loading and water temperatures will have implications for the fish \u2013 and for entities seeking to comply with Endangered Species Act<\/strong> requirements. These include federal, state, and local governments, as well as private persons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    The Willamette and lower Columbia Rivers, and their tributaries, traverse a range of elevations. Ash trees comprise a larger proportion of the trees in the low elevation riparian and wetland forests. Consequently, Maze, Bond and Mattsson expect that EAB-induced loss of Oregon ash will have significant impacts on these rivers\u2019 water quality and aquatic habitats. The higher water temperatures will affect aquatic organisms at multiple trophic levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    They conclude that the EAB invasion West of the Cascade Mountain range constitutes an example of the worst-case forest pest scenario<\/strong>: the loss of a dominant and largely functionally irreplaceable tree species that provides critical habitat for both ESA-listed and other species, along with degradation of ecosystem services that protect water quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Breeding Oregon Ash \u2026 Challenges to be Overcome<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    According to Melton et al<\/em>. (2024), Oregon ash does not begin to reproduce until it is 30 years old. Such an extended reproductive cycle could complicate breeding efforts unless scientists are able to accelerate flowering or use grafting techniques to speed up reproduction \u2013 as suggested by Richard Sniezko, USFS expert on tree breeding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    Melton et al. (2024) note that the IUCN has recently highlighted the importance of maintaining a species\u2019 genetic variation in order to maintain its evolutionary potential. Consequently, they examined genetic variation in Oregon ash in order to identify the species\u2019 ability to adjust to both the EAB threat and climate change. The authors sequenced the genomes of 1,083 individual ash trees from 61 populations. These spanned the species\u2019 range from Vancouver Island to southern California. The genetic analysis detected four genetic clusters:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. British Columbia;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    2. Washington to central Oregon \u2013 including the Columbia River and its principal tributaries;<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    3. Southwest Oregon and Northwest California — the Klamath-Siskiyou ecoregion; and<\/li>\n\n\n\n
    4. all other California populations.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      Connectivity between populations (that is, the potential corridors of movement for pollen and seeds and hence, genetic flow) was greatest in the riparian areas of the Columbia River and its tributaries in the center to the species\u2019 range. Despite this evidence of connectivity, nucleotide diversity and effective population size were low across all populations. This suggests that the patchy distribution of Oregon ash populations might reduce its long-term evolutionary potential. As average temperatures rise, the regional populations will become more distinct genetically. The species\u2019 ability to adjust to future climate projections is most constrained in populations on Vancouver Island and in smaller river valleys at the eastern and western edges of the range. Populations in southern California might be \u201cpre-adapted\u201d to warmer temperatures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The resulting lower effective population size might exacerbate risks associated with EAB. The authors warned that although seeds from more than 350 maternal parent trees have been preserved<\/a> since 2019, these collections do not cover the full genomic variation across Oregon ash\u2019s range. Some genomic variation that represents adaptive variation critical to the species\u2019 long-term evolution might be missing. They advocate using the genetic data from their study to identify regions where additional collections of germplasm are needed for both progeny trials and for long-term conservation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      <\/p>\n\n\n

      \n
      \"\"<\/a>
      Oregon white oak with symptoms of Mediterranean oak borer infestation; photo by Christine Buhl, Oregon Department of Forestry<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

      Oregon White Oak <\/strong> (Quercus garryana<\/em>) <\/strong>and the Mediterranean Oak Borer<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The U.S. Department of Interior has been working with regional partners for 10 years to protect oak and prairie <\/strong>habitat for five ESA-listed species, two candidate species, and numerous other plant and animal species of concern. In August 2025 the Department announced creation of the Willamette Valley Conservation Area. It becomes part of the Willamette Valley National Wildlife Refuge Complex. <\/strong>These units are managed predominantly to maintain winter habitat for dusky geese (a separate population of Canada geese). Other units<\/a> in the Complex are William L. Finley National Wildlife Refuge<\/a>, Ankeny National Wildlife Refuge<\/a>, and Baskett Slough National Wildlife Refuge<\/a>.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      These goals too face threats from non-native forest pests. First, the forested swamps of Ankeny NWR are composed nearly 100% of ash<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Second, Oregon white oak now confronts its own non-native pest \u2013 the Mediterranean oak borer (Xyleborus monographus<\/em>). This Eurasian ambrosia beetle has been introduced to the northern end of the Willamette Valley (near Troutville, Oregon). It is likely that infestations are more widespread. Authorities are surveying areas near Salem. A separate introduction has become established in California, north of San Francisco Bay plus in Sacramento County in the Central Valley. Oregon white oak is vulnerable to at least one of the fungi vectored by this borer \u2013 Raffaelea montety. <\/em>https:\/\/www.dontmovefirewood.org\/pest_pathogen\/mediterranean-oak-borer\/<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      SOURCES<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Maze, D., J. Bond and M. Mattsson. 2024. Modelling impacts to water quality in salmonid-bearing waterways following the introduction of emerald ash borer in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Biol Invasions<\/em> (2024) 26:2691\u20132705  https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10530-024-03340-3<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Melton, A.E., T.M. Faske, R.A. Sniezko, T. Thibault, W. Williams, T. Parchman, and J.A. Hamilton. 2024. Genomics-driven monitoring of Fraxinus latifolia<\/em> (Oregon Ash) for conservation and emerald ash borer resistance breeding. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10530-024-03340-3<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Profita, C. April 26, 2024. State crews remove trees in Washington County to slow spread of emerald ash borer. Oregon Public Broadcasting. https:\/\/www.opb.org\/article\/2024\/04\/26\/oregon-invasive-beetle-emerald-ash-borer-infestation-tree-removal\/#:~:text=It%20was%20first%20detected%20in%20Oregon%20in%20Forest%20Grove%20in%20June%202022.&text=This%20week%2C%20crews%20removed%20dozens,ash%20trees%20from%20the%20area<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      Posted by Faith Campbell<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      We welcome comments that supplement or correct factual information, suggest new approaches, or promote thoughtful consideration. We post comments that disagree with us — but not those we judge to be not civil or inflammatory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      For a detailed discussion of the policies and practices that have allowed these pests to enter and spread \u2013 and that do not promote effective restoration strategies \u2013 review the Fading Forests report at  https:\/\/treeimprovement.tennessee.edu\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

      or<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      www.fadingforests.org<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      One of these insects is the emerald ash borer (EAB). We easterners have \u201cbeen there & done that\u201d. However, programs aimed at conserving wetlands and riparian areas of the Western states \u2013 and the associated species — are at least as vulnerable to loss of ash. Worse, other tree taxa, specifically oaks, and the open … Continue reading Two Non-Native Insects Threaten Forest, Salmonid, and Waterway Conservation in Pacific Northwest<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[16,15,10,24,5,17,28,31,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conservation-priorities","category-drivers-of-extinction","category-forest-health-comblog","category-forest-pest-insects","category-forest-pests-comblog","category-invasive-species-policy","category-resistance-breeding","category-state-actions","category-wood-packaging"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p65EGp-1jD","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5061"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5075,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5061\/revisions\/5075"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nivemnic.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}